Speaker summary
48% 7 analyzed articles/videos 481 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jared Genser results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 136.316 hits . Analysis detected 1,042.803 faulty-reasoning hits from 481 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,189 of 27,797 speakers). This Jared Genser is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group. Jared Genser
Speaker details
Total words: 481
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.4% percentile 9.0% BS Score7 analyzed videos481 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 23.3% 23.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst