Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Abigail Williams results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 138 hits . Analysis detected 1,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Abigail Williams is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Abigail Williams
Author details
Total words: 1,356
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.2% 3.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 7.2% 7.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst