Author summary
58% 3 analyzed articles/videos 125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Babak Dehghanpisheh results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 371 hits . Analysis detected 2,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,856 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,082 of 6,628 authors). This Babak Dehghanpisheh is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Babak Dehghanpisheh
Author details
Total words: 1,856
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.7% percentile 5.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.4% 11.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.4% 7.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst