Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amin Khodadadi results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 588 hits . Analysis detected 2,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,820 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,320 of 6,628 authors). This Amin Khodadadi is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. Amin Khodadadi
Author details
Total words: 2,820
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.1% percentile 4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.3% 12.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.9% 20.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.1% 14.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.7% 6.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst