Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Engel results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 715 hits . Analysis detected 2,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,800 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,456 of 6,348 authors). This Richard Engel is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Richard Engel
Author details
Total words: 2,800
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.1% percentile 4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.5% 12.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.0% 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 25.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst