Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chantal Da Silva results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 535 hits . Analysis detected 2,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,470 of 6,359 authors). This Chantal Da Silva is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group. Chantal Da Silva
Author details
Total words: 2,560
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.9% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.8% 11.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.9% 20.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst