Speaker summary
51% 17 analyzed articles/videos 882 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamieson Greer results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 271 hits . Analysis detected 2,099.246 faulty-reasoning hits from 882 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,396 of 28,364 speakers). This Jamieson Greer is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. Jamieson Greer
Speaker details
Total words: 882
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.9% percentile 7.8% BS Score17 analyzed videos882 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.5% 15.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 21.1% 21.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Red Herring: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst