Speaker summary
49% 5 analyzed articles/videos 512.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamf results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection , Appeal to Authority , and Recency Bias , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 193 hits . Analysis detected 1,164.113 faulty-reasoning hits from 512.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of 13% (24,879 of 28,364 speakers). This Jamf is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group. Jamf
Speaker details
Total words: 512.333
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.3% percentile 10.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos512.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 23.2% 23.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 21.9% 21.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 20.9% 20.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Composition/Division: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst