Author summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthony Spadafora results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Loss Aversion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 615 hits . Analysis detected 3,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,283 of 6,628 authors). This Anthony Spadafora is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Anthony Spadafora
Author details
Total words: 3,216
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.7% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 9.5% 9.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.1% 6.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 13.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Author 9.5%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst