Author summary
18% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Goodin results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 691 hits . Analysis detected 6,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,828 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,082 of 6,382 authors). This Dan Goodin is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Dan Goodin
Author details
Total words: 9,828
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.6% 6.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst