Speaker summary
⁠39%4 analyzed articles/videos83.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Uthmeier results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Bandwagon, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 238 faulty-reasoning hits from 83.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,207 of 28,364 speakers). This James Uthmeier is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
James Uthmeier
Speaker details
Total words: 83.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.8% percentile
22.1% BS Score4 analyzed videos83.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 17.8%17.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 37.0%37.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.8%17.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos