Speaker summary
58% 22 analyzed articles/videos 2,046.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Talarico results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 421.751 hits . Analysis detected 3,907.787 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,046.667 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,936 of 28,364 speakers). This James Talarico is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. James Talarico
Speaker details
Total words: 2,046.667
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 4.1% BS Score22 analyzed videos2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 20.6% 20.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst