Speaker summary
⁠26%2 analyzed articles/videos92.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jackson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Blind-Spot Bias, and Special Pleading, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 110 faulty-reasoning hits from 92.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (23,952 of 28,364 speakers). This Jackson is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Jackson
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 92.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510015.6% percentile
11.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos92.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.5%19.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 3.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos