Speaker summary
⁠53%5 analyzed articles/videos326.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Posobiec results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 1,146.22 faulty-reasoning hits from 326.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,298 of 28,364 speakers). This Jack Posobiec is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Jack Posobiec
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510010.8% percentile
9.7% BS Score5 analyzed videos326.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 22.2%22.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 22.4%22.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.8%14.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos