Speaker summary
40% 21 analyzed articles/videos 535.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iranian state television results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 162 hits . Analysis detected 993.602 faulty-reasoning hits from 535.333 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,413 of 28,364 speakers). This Iranian state television is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. Iranian state television
Speaker details
Total words: 535.333
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.4% percentile 5.6% BS Score21 analyzed videos535.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 31.6% 31.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst