Speaker summary
⁠55%4 analyzed articles/videos190.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Rescue Committee results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Burden of Proof, and Framing Effect, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 61.5% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 190.5 analyzed words across 4 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 20.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,086 of 28,364 speakers). This International Rescue Committee is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
International Rescue Committee
Speaker details
Total words: 190.5
Content count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.7% percentile
20.4% BS Score4 analyzed videos190.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 61.5%61.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 52.2%52.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 26.5%26.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.4%27.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 20.1%20.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 61.5%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 52.2%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Special Pleading: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos