Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecilia Cisneros results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 558 hits . Analysis detected 3,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (4,096 of 6,628 authors). This Cecilia Cisneros is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group. Cecilia Cisneros
Author details
Total words: 5,296
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst