Speaker summary
⁠51%3 analyzed articles/videos88.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ilan Goldenberg results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 322.669 faulty-reasoning hits from 88.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (20,050 of 28,364 speakers). This Ilan Goldenberg is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Ilan Goldenberg
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.3% percentile
18.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos88.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 37.8%37.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.1%31.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.9%8.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.8%15.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos