Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,833 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Petraeus results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Indoctrination , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 518 hits . Analysis detected 5,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,472 of 6,628 authors). This David Petraeus is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. David Petraeus
Author details
Total words: 7,332
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.9% 5.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.3% 6.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst