Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,610 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rafael Mariano Grossi results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and False Dilemma , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 566 hits . Analysis detected 4,837 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,685 of 6,393 authors). This Rafael Mariano Grossi is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Rafael Mariano Grossi
Author details
Total words: 6,440
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst