Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video52.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heelis results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 62% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 195.599 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,949 of 28,364 speakers). This Heelis is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Heelis
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 52.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
44.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos52.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 71.5%71.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 55.9%55.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 62.0%62.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 41.0%41.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 38.0%38.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 19.0%19.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%In-Group Bias: Speaker 71.5%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 62.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 41.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos