Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,335 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Fraser results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 1,235 hits . Analysis detected 9,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,079 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,503 of 6,319 authors). This Laura Fraser is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group. Laura Fraser
Author details
Total words: 10,079
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.3% 12.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst