Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sameer Chhabra results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 771 hits . Analysis detected 5,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,412 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,405 of 6,348 authors). This Sameer Chhabra is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Sameer Chhabra
Author details
Total words: 8,412
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst