CBC Radio49%

Running a hospital is expensive. Expect to see more advertising from them 58%

By Sameer Chhabra0% Laura Fraser0%

4/27/2026, 8:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 202 hits. Analysis detected 1,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 797 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (9,367 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the article peer group.

LISTEN | "We're number 2!" 
Why a Canadian hospital is boasting: 
If you live in Toronto, you may have heard University Health Network (UHN) bragging on the radio about being the top hospital in Canada for the eighth year in a row, according to Newsweek’s rankings at least. 
Like most of us, you might tune out ads  though maybe there’s some part of you that realizes it’s a little unusual to hear a hospital give itself a pat on the back. 
But marketing experts and health-care executives say to expect more advertising like this in Canada, something that’s already prominent in the U.S. 
The reason? 
People are living longer and have more complex medical needs, meaning hospitals are raising money in order to attract top-tier professionals and afford the latest equipment in diagnostics and treatment. 
An MRI scanner, for example, costs anywhere from $200,000 for a refurbished machine to millions for the latest models that provide the highest details in imaging. 
In Ontario, the province allocated $20 million in 2022 to cover the operating costs of 27 new MRI scanners, but buying those machines fell to the hospitals. 
"If they don't continue to stand out and attract donor dollars, then they're going to lack in all of those ways that they're able to innovate and grow," health communications specialist Melissa K. 
Blair told White Coat, Black Art in a recent interview. 
Then there’s the other target: potential employees. 
Canadian hospitals, especially rural ones, are chronically shuttering emergency rooms due to staffing shortages. 
Between 2022 and 2024, 38 Ontario hospitals or urgent care centres had to close their emergency rooms for a collective 66,000 hours. 
And there’s always competition for specialists. 
WATCH | UHN #2 Hospital in the World: 
It’s why UHN launched Canada Leads, a program aimed at attracting international health-care professionals alongside its general campaign, UHNITED, its president and CEO Kevin Smith said. 
Since the launch of Canada Leads in 2024, UHN has received 725 applications from more than 30 countries, hiring 71 researchers, scientists and clinician-scientists so far. 
"We've seen an unbelievable increase in the number of people who are interested in coming to Canada, particularly in some areas like virology," he said. 
The program has raised roughly $54 million to date, according to UHN. 
Advertising as community-building 
In Scarborough, they’ve taken a different approach, focusing on the hospital system's underdog status with the Love, Scarborough campaign, something that resonates with community sentiment. 
"The whole community kind of feels like they're forgotten about," said Kyla Tymchen, who worked in marketing and communications at the Scarborough Health Foundation when the campaign was conceived. 
“So to finally have something like [the] Love, Scarborough [campaign] that comes out and speaks to them and gives them a voice, I think was really refreshing." 
It also shows how hospitals can combine fundraising and community-building, Blair said. 
Since the campaign launched in 2022, commercials have highlighted how Scarborough's hospitals "have been forced to do more with less." 
Online, pictures of doctors and nurses  “the faces of health care”  share why they keep showing up for patients, despite the challenges of being the underdog. 
WATCH | Love, Scarborough: 
The campaign has raised $200 million as of December 2025 and prompted a renewed sense of pride in the Scarborough community, said Tymchen. 
The UHNited campaign takes a similar documentary-style approach, using real patients and staff to tell its stories. 
Smith said the ads are not just about raising money but recognizing the extraordinary work of nurses, doctors and staff  often in situations that challenge them. 
“People on the front line aren't feeling the love every day. 
We have more violence in our emergency rooms than ever in our careers,” he said. 
“It was equally important for this to be motivating, inspiring and uplifting to the people who do the work, as well as the people who we are privileged to work on or with.” 
‘Not as humble’ 
Heelis says even smaller hospitals can lean into community-centric, authentic advertising 
"I also personally love it when they're maybe not as humble as we normally are as Canadians," she said. 
"We should be proud that we have some of the best institutions in the world." 
And UHN heralding its No. 1 status isn’t meant to throw shade at other hospitals, its CEO and president said. 
In fact, Smith said he hopes the investments the Toronto hospital system has made in AI and virtual care can offer benefits across the country. 
“I wanna be able to say [that] UHN can support a small hospital in Northern Ontario or an Indigenous population  to be able bring them the same standard of care that a patient on University Avenue gets," he said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.1%Sameer Chhabra: 0.9%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 1.6%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Sameer Chhabra: 1.5%CBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic4.8%This article: 0.8%Sameer Chhabra: 0.1%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.8%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 1.2%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Sameer Chhabra: 1.8%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.5%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.7%Sameer Chhabra: 5.9%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias15.7%This article: 4.1%Sameer Chhabra: 0.7%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias4.1%This article: 16.2%Sameer Chhabra: 2.4%CBC: 5.7%Negativity Bias16.2%This article: 8.3%Sameer Chhabra: 1.5%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Sameer Chhabra: 1.5%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Sameer Chhabra: 2.3%CBC: 3.6%Halo Effect10.7%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Sameer Chhabra: 0.2%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias1.9%This article: 4.3%Sameer Chhabra: 0.4%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.2%Sameer Chhabra: 9.2%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority15.2%This article: 5.9%Sameer Chhabra: 1.1%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma5.9%This article: 4.1%Sameer Chhabra: 0.9%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope4.1%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.7%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.0%Sameer Chhabra: 4.8%CBC: 4.8%Hasty Generalization9.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 25.3%Sameer Chhabra: 5.2%CBC: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion25.3%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 16.4%Sameer Chhabra: 2.8%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.4%This article: 2.5%Sameer Chhabra: 0.2%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque2.5%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.3%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 17.9%Sameer Chhabra: 4.1%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal17.9%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.8%Sameer Chhabra: 3.1%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.8%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.8%Sameer Chhabra: 0.6%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote4.8%This article: 1.6%Sameer Chhabra: 0.7%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.6%This article: 9.0%Sameer Chhabra: 2.2%CBC: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice9.0%This article: 10.3%Sameer Chhabra: 4.1%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination10.3%This article: 0.0%Sameer Chhabra: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Sameer Chhabra: 0.4%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.6%This article: 2.1%Sameer Chhabra: 1.5%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.1%

797 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers54%attributed speech369writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa K. Blair • 33 words • 100.0% coverageMelissa K. Blair • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageKevin Smith • 26 words • 0.0% coverageUHN • 26 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Smith • 25 words • 0.0% coverageUHN • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKyla Tymchen • 29 words • 0.0% coverageKyla Tymchen • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa K. Blair • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageKyla Tymchen • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageKevin Smith • 27 words • 100.0% coverageKevin Smith • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Smith • 15 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Smith • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageHeelis • 19 words • 0.0% coverageHeelis • 15 words • 100.0% coverageKevin Smith • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Smith • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Smith • 40 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Heelis

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words7.9% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Indoctrination+44.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Heelis: 44.1%44.1%Biased Writer Voice-19.5 ptsWriter: 19.5%Heelis: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -10.0 ptsWriter: 10.0%Heelis: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Heelis: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.5 ptsWriter: 3.5%Heelis: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.4 ptsWriter: 1.4%Heelis: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.