Speaker summary
⁠55%5 analyzed articles/videos77.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamas results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 193.684 faulty-reasoning hits from 77.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,159 of 28,364 speakers). This Hamas is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Hamas
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.0% percentile
22.2% BS Score5 analyzed videos77.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 26.0%26.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 31.0%31.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos