Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammad Mansour results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,910 hits. Analysis detected 11,003 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,975 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,810 of 6,347 authors). This Mohammad Mansour is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Mohammad Mansour
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
25%Mohammad Mansour (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,975
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles14K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate