Speaker summary
65% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,807.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Sargent results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 942.999 hits . Analysis detected 7,682.113 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,807.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,192 of 28,364 speakers). This Greg Sargent is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Greg Sargent
Speaker details
Total words: 4,807.333
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score7 analyzed videos4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst