Speaker summary
40% 58 analyzed articles/videos 2,372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Google results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection , Optimism Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 295.676 hits . Analysis detected 3,137.714 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,372 analyzed words across 58 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (27,446 of 27,549 speakers). This Google is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. Google
Speaker details
Total words: 2,372
Article count: 58
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score58 analyzed videos2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst