Speaker summary
⁠33%3 analyzed articles/videos306.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These GiveSendGo results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Circular Reasoning, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 447.589 faulty-reasoning hits from 306.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (22,026 of 25,860 speakers). This GiveSendGo is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
GiveSendGo

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510014.8% percentile
11.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos306.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 7.5%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos