Speaker summary
47%34 analyzed articles/videos1,744.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gianni Infantino results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 322.248 hits. Analysis detected 2,830.792 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,744.333 analyzed words across 34 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,404 of 26,862 speakers). This Gianni Infantino is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Gianni Infantino

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.7% percentile
4.3% BS Score34 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.7%5.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.9%14.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Could the World Cup be back in the US as soon as 2038? Absolutely65%
The Guardian80%By Matt Hughes0%7/21/2026, 7:00:53 PM
World Cup final between Spain and Argentina watched by roughly 60 million on Fox and Telemundo32%
Baltimore Sun25%By Associated Press60%7/21/2026, 7:27:32 AM
U.S. & World – NBC New York46%
NBC New York82%By The Associated Press64%7/21/2026, 2:02:49 AM
World's GREATEST Event Football's Massive Success Revealed!100%
NTD100%7/20/2026, 1:13:39 PM
Despite some irritating flaws, 2026 World Cup a rousing success for FIFA, U.S. and fans67%
Los Angeles Times79%By Kevin Baxter71%7/20/2026, 11:00:00 AM
Mapped: How FIFA's president criss-crossed North America on a private jet to watch over 40 World Cup games in 39 days21%
Business Insider15%By Pete Syme40%7/19/2026, 2:12:40 PM
Welcome to America’s post-World Cup hangover89%
Vox51%By Alex Abad-Santos60%7/19/2026, 10:00:00 AM
UK urges FIFA to investigate Argentina over Falklands banner at World Cup13%
Baltimore Sun25%By Associated Press60%7/16/2026, 8:09:40 AM
El presidente de la FIFA podría enfrentar una investigación tras presunto favoritismo hacia EEUU40%
PolitiFact5%By Maria Briceño8%7/15/2026, 2:51:47 PM
El presidente de la FIFA podría enfrentar una investigación tras presunto favoritismo hacia EEUU15%
PolitiFact5%By Alex Min8%7/14/2026, 12:00:00 AM