Author summary
41% 1 analyzed article/video 1,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Syme results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 334 hits . Analysis detected 1,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,377 of 6,628 authors). This Pete Syme is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Pete Syme
Author details
Total words: 3,168
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.5% 8.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.5% No True Scotsman: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst