Speaker summary
31%12 analyzed articles/videos319.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 461.682 faulty-reasoning hits from 319.333 analyzed words across 12 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,725 of 28,329 speakers). This George is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
George
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 319.333
Content count: 12
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.1% percentile
4.6% BS Score12 analyzed videos319.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 26.0%26.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Red Herring: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate