Speaker summary
⁠56%5 analyzed articles/videos342.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ferran Torres results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, In-Group Bias, and Bandwagon, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 410.564 faulty-reasoning hits from 342.5 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,661 of 28,364 speakers). This Ferran Torres is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Ferran Torres
Speaker details
Total words: 342.5
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751002.5% percentile
4.9% BS Score5 analyzed videos342.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 4.7%4.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.4%6.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Special Pleading: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos