Speaker summary
50% 6 analyzed articles/videos 472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fernando Grande-Marlaska results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 77.795 hits . Analysis detected 815.776 faulty-reasoning hits from 472 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (37,093 of 38,974 speakers). This Fernando Grande-Marlaska is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group. Fernando Grande-Marlaska
Speaker details
Total words: 472
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.8% percentile 6.3% BS Score6 analyzed videos472 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Middle Ground: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst