Author summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 1,057 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AKRAM OUBACHIR — Associated Press results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 291 hits . Analysis detected 2,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 44% (4,841 of 8,523 authors). This AKRAM OUBACHIR — Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. AKRAM OUBACHIR — Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 4,228
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst