Author summary
43%3 analyzed articles/videos2,950 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sergio Rodrigo Ruíz results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 766 hits. Analysis detected 6,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,800 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (7,250 of 8,522 authors). This Sergio Rodrigo Ruíz is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
Sergio Rodrigo Ruíz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
15%Sergio Rodrigo Ruíz (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,800
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510014.9% percentile
1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos