Author summary
49%1 analyzed article/video1,343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Renata Brito results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Fundamental Attribution Error, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 379 hits. Analysis detected 3,248 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,253 of 8,769 authors). This Renata Brito is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Renata Brito
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
41%Renata Brito (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,372
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

40% percentile
025507510040.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos