Author summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Silvio Canto results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 388 hits . Analysis detected 2,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (894 of 8,508 authors). This Silvio Canto is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Silvio Canto
Author details
Total words: 1,472
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.5% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 26.4% 26.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.5% 25.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.6% 8.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 8.2% 8.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.8% 11.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 26.4%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.6%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst