Speaker summary
27%14 analyzed articles/videos379.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Aviation Administration results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 270 faulty-reasoning hits from 379.667 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 6% (25,358 of 26,731 speakers). This Federal Aviation Administration is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.1% percentile
6.8% BS Score14 analyzed videos379.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate