Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,733 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suzanne Rowan Kelleher results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 785 hits. Analysis detected 6,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,932 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,759 of 6,628 authors). This Suzanne Rowan Kelleher is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Suzanne Rowan Kelleher
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
44%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,932
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510043.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate