Forbes46%

JetBlue Jet May Have Hit Drone At New York’s JFK Airport 51%

By Suzanne Rowan Kelleher0%

6/29/2026, 8:30:48 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 840 faulty-reasoning hits from 340 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.4% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,901 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the article peer group.

The crew of a JetBlue Airways flight from Las Vegas to New York reported striking a drone while approaching to land at JFK airport on Monday morning, The Wall Street Journal reported and the airline confirmed to Forbes. 
The FAA told Forbes it is investigating the incident, adding “a post-flight inspection did not reveal any damage to the aircraft,” in a statement. 
This incident follows a similar encounter between a drone and United Airlines jet at Newark International Airport on Friday. 
The FAA receives more than 100 reports of drones near airports each month. 
837,513. 
That’s how many active drones were registered with the FAA as of early 2026. 
In February, the FAA closed the airspace around El Paso International Airport for 10 days due to “special security reasons” and then reversed course hours later. 
The New York Times reported the shutdown was prompted by the Pentagon’s use of new counter-drone technology and concerns about the risks it could pose to other aircraft in the area. 
The FAA has never publicly confirmed a collision involving a drone and a U.S. commercial passenger airliner, unlike between drones and helicopters and drones and private jets. 
However, commercial airline crews have reported suspected drone strikes and numerous near-misses. 
Nine near misses between commercial jets and drones were reported in the first three months of 2026, Forbes found in reviewing NASA’s Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS), a program that lets aviation workers file confidential reports without fear of punishment. 
In 2025, 55 near misses between a commercial passenger jet and a drone were anonymously reported. 
An Associated Press analysis of the same database found that in 2024, drones accounted for nearly two-thirds of reported near midair collisions involving commercial passenger planes taking off and landing at the country’s top 30 busiest airports. 
“Operating drones around airplanes, helicopters and airports is dangerous and illegal,” according to the FAA, noting “unauthorized operators may be subject to stiff fines and criminal charges, including possible jail time.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.5%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 3.1%Forbes: 3.1%Confirmation Bias3.5%This article: 5.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 1.5%Forbes: 1.2%Anchoring Bias5.0%This article: 7.4%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 3.0%Forbes: 3.0%Availability Heuristic7.4%This article: 15.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 2.0%Forbes: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic15.0%This article: 7.9%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.4%Forbes: 0.7%Hindsight Bias7.9%This article: 11.8%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 2.6%Forbes: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias11.8%This article: 9.1%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 11.3%Forbes: 5.8%Framing Effect9.1%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 2.9%Forbes: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 3.8%Forbes: 3.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 1.5%Forbes: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.8%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 5.5%Forbes: 5.4%Negativity Bias16.8%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.4%Forbes: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 1.0%Forbes: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.2%Forbes: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 1.7%Forbes: 3.2%Halo Effect9.1%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 1.8%Forbes: 1.6%Recency Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 40.9%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 8.0%Forbes: 4.6%Appeal to Authority40.9%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 2.1%Forbes: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.6%Forbes: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.6%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 6.7%Forbes: 5.7%Hasty Generalization15.6%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.4%Forbes: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.5%Forbes: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.1%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 2.4%Forbes: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion9.1%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 1.5%Forbes: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.6%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 2.4%Forbes: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.6%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.6%Forbes: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 10.9%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.5%Forbes: 0.3%Composition/Division10.9%This article: 8.2%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 1.3%Forbes: 2.0%Anecdotal8.2%This article: 7.9%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.4%Forbes: 0.1%No True Scotsman7.9%This article: 0.3%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 1.1%Forbes: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.3%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 16.2%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 3.9%Forbes: 1.1%Unattributed Quote16.2%This article: 7.1%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 4.4%Forbes: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection7.1%This article: 11.2%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 5.7%Forbes: 4.6%Biased Writer Voice11.2%This article: 20.9%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 1.1%Forbes: 2.5%Indoctrination20.9%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 0.2%Forbes: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 1.8%Forbes: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzanne Rowan Kelleher: 1.2%Forbes: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

340 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.