Topic summary
36% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Business-And-Finance results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 837 hits . Analysis detected 6,602 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,497 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (12,201 of 16,562 topics). This Business-And-Finance is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Business-And-Finance
Topic details
Total words: 8,497
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst