Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video918 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paula Conway results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 45.8% saturation with 1,683 hits. Analysis detected 5,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (879 of 6,628 authors). This Paula Conway is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Paula Conway
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠87%Paula Conway (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,672
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510086.8% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 45.8%45.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 21.0%21.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 19.0%19.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 11.1%11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 45.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 21.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 19.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Author 11.1%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Author 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos