Speaker summary
⁠50%5 analyzed articles/videos76.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FAA results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 57.5% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 154 faulty-reasoning hits from 76.667 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 31.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,255 of 28,364 speakers). This FAA is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
FAA
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 76.667
Content count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
31.8% BS Score5 analyzed videos76.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 57.5%57.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 56.4%56.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.0%15.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 57.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 56.4%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos