Fox News⁠98%

FAA investigating after drone COLLIDES with commercial plane #shorts #us #news #foxnews #planes #FAA ⁠96%

6/30/2026, 4:45:20 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 78.5% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 527 faulty-reasoning hits from 107 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,083 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 95.10% of the video peer group.

Concerns over air safety here in New York after [music] two close calls on the very same day. 
One where a helicopter nearly crashed [music] into a remote controlled plane, and another where a drone collided [music] with a JetBlue plane right before landing at JFK Airport. 
>> After approach, but collided with a drone back there in the turn. 
>> You said you collided? 
>> Yep, it hit us right right above the cockpit. 
>> Thankfully, the FAA says no damage to the plane was reported and they are investigating the incident. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.8%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias16.8%This article: 16.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias16.8%This article: 78.5%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic78.5%This article: 43.9%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic43.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 40.2%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect40.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.8%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias16.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 78.5%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias78.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect13.1%This article: 4.7%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.8%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority16.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 43.9%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization43.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 22.4%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion22.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof4.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 78.5%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal78.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 16.8%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)16.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S
0.0%

107 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker17%attributed speech89writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice ‱ 14 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 18 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 29 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 13 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 10 words ‱ 0.0% coverageFAA ‱ 18 words ‱ 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

FAA

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading

Loading

Loading

Loading


Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.