Speaker summary
⁠32%4 analyzed articles/videos79.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Zanotti results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Bandwagon, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 159 faulty-reasoning hits from 79.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,130 of 28,364 speakers). This Emily Zanotti is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Emily Zanotti
Speaker details
Total words: 79.667
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
16.6% BS Score4 analyzed videos79.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.0%20.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.4%14.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 7.5%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos