Speaker summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ember results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Recency Bias, and Composition/Division, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 46.6% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 376 faulty-reasoning hits from 158 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,442 of 28,364 speakers). This Ember is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Ember
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 158
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.0% percentile
21.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos158 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 46.6%46.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 30.1%30.1%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 25.5%25.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 46.6%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 9.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos