Speaker summary
ā 76%3 analyzed articles/videos78.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edi Rama results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and False Dilemma, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 46.8% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 307.266 faulty-reasoning hits from 78.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.1% and a BS Rank of ā 46% (15,552 of 28,364 speakers). This Edi Rama is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Edi Rama
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 46%Edi Rama (selected)29%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 78.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.2% percentile
28.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos78.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 63.0%63.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 46.8%46.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.1%16.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%False Dilemma: Speaker 63.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 46.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 0.3%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos