Speaker summary
⁠39%4 analyzed articles/videos136.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DuckDuckGo results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 183 faulty-reasoning hits from 136.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (22,968 of 28,364 speakers). This DuckDuckGo is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
DuckDuckGo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 136.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
13.5% BS Score4 analyzed videos136.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.0%39.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos