Author summary
81% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karandeep Singh results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 1,901 hits . Analysis detected 15,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,438 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,040 of 6,628 authors). This Karandeep Singh is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group. Karandeep Singh
Author details
Total words: 10,438
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 18.2% 18.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.9% 16.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 14.2% 14.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 18.2%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 14.2%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst